Real Estate

of 9
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Document Description
Real estate 1 Real estate In general use, esp. North American, 'real estate' is taken to mean Property consisting of land and the buildings on it, along with its natural resources such as crops, minerals, or water; immovable property of this nature; an interest vested in this; (also) an item of real property; (more generally) buildings or housing in general. Also: the business of real estate; the profession of buying, selling, or renting land, buildings, or housing. [1] It is a legal term in
Document Share
Document Tags
Document Transcript
  Real estate1 Real estate In general use, esp. North American, 'real estate' is taken to mean Property consisting of land and the buildings onit, along with its natural resources such as crops, minerals, or water; immovable property of this nature; an interestvested in this; (also) an item of real property; (more generally) buildings or housing in general. Also: the business of real estate; the profession of buying, selling, or renting land, buildings, or housing. [1] It is a legal term in some jurisdictions, such as the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, United States of America,Dubai, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, and The Bahamas. [2] 'Real Estate Law' is the body of regulations and legalcodes which pertain to such matters under a particular jurisdiction and include things such as commercial andresidential property ownership, development and transactions. Real estate is often considered synonymous with realproperty (sometimes called realty), in contrast with personal property (sometimes called 'chattels' or 'personalty'under 'chattel law' or 'personal property law'). The terms 'real estate' and 'real property' are used primarily in commonlaw, while civil law jurisdictions refer instead to immovable property. However, in some situations the term 'realestate' refers to the land and fixtures thereon together, as distinguished from 'real property', referring to theownership of land and its appurtenances, including anything of a permanent nature such as structures, trees,minerals, and the interest, benefits, and inherent rights thereof. Real property is typically considered to beimmovable property. [3] Etymology In the laws of the United States of America, the 'real' in 'real estate' means relating to a thing (res/'rei', thing, fromO.Fr. 'reel', from L.L. 'realis' 'actual', from Latin. 'res', 'matter, thing'), [4] as distinguished from a person. Thus the lawbroadly distinguishes between 'real' property (land and anything affixed to it) and 'personal' property or chattels(everything else, e.g., clothing, furniture, money). The conceptual difference was between 'immovable property',which would transfer title along with the land, and 'movable property', which a person could lawfully take and wouldretain title to on disposal of the land.The oldest document using a term recognizable as 'real estate' in historical records is dated 1605. [5] This use of 'real'also reflects the ancient feudal customs in relation to land and the ownership (and owners) thereof, introduced intoEngland over 500 years earlier, by William the Conqueror in 1066.Some people have claimed that the word 'real' in this sense is descended (like French 'royal' and Spanish 'real') fromthe Latin word for 'king'. In the feudal system (which has left many traces in the common law) the king was theowner of all land, and everyone who occupied land paid him rent directly or indirectly (through lords who in turnpaid the king), in cash, goods, or services (including military service). Property tax, paid to the state, can be seen as arelic of that system, as too is the term fee simple. Some say this derivation is a misconception; [6] but that is counteredby evidence that the earliest meaning of 'real' in English included Of, relating to, or characteristic of a monarch,royalty, or (by extension) the nobility, esp. with regard to power, wealth, or dignity; (also) befitting a monarch. [7] Additionally, there is evidence that the earliest meaning of 'real' in English included Having an objective existence;actually existing physically as a thing, substantial; not imaginary. [8] which supports the statement in the firstparagraph of this section on the Etymology of the term 'real estate' that 'real' = 'relating to a thing … as distinguishedfrom a person'. However, it needs to be borne in mind that the time between the Norman Conquest and the earliestrecorded documentary appearance of 'real estate' allowed for both meanings of the word 'real' to gain commoncurrency in verbal and written use in England, as individual words; and for the term 'real estate' to gain commoncurrency in verbal and written use with the word 'real' in it having the same meanings, or, one, or even more,different meanings, to when it was used on its own; but of which there is no specific, historical documentaryevidence. [9]  Real estate2On that basis, the reason for these several possible meanings of 'real' in relation to 'real estate' may have been that notall of England and Wales became 'real estate' in the 'royal' sense by reason only of the Norman Conquest. TheDomesday Book provides evidence that some holdingsof land in England and Wales remained in the hands of  people, who were not the king. In other words, they were allodial land. Two main classes of that allodial land aredistinguishable, by inference and synthesis, from, the Domesday Book; the passage and enforcement of the Act of Supremacy 1534 and Laws in Wales Acts 1535-1542 by Henry VIII of England; Welsh Law prior to 1535; and thehistory of Probate in England and Wales; namely, that of the Roman Catholic Church, and that of the parts of Waleswhere the custom known as 'dadunnedd' under Welsh Law applied.Another etymological consequence of those radical measures by Henry VIII wasthat the expression 'real estate' became an official English expression, and the English 'law of real estate' became the official realestate law of England and Wales, because the Laws in Wales Acts 1535-1542 included clauses requiring that, upon the dayappointed by the statute, and thereafter, nolaw or languageother than those of England shall be used in the courts of  England and Wales. This meant that the laws of the Roman Catholic Church and of the former Welsh kings wereeradicated from use throughout England and Wales. The clauses concerning language were repealed by Elizabeth IIin 1993, to facilitate use of minority languages in the courts of England and Wales as the populations of thosenations had by then become multi-cultural, because those clauses infringed the human rights of the people that spokethem.English Real Estate Law recognises rights of way, etc., on land beyond the limits of the subject land, including rightsof passage and repassage over other lands, including such parts of those other lands between the high and low watermarks of tidal waters adjoinging them, foruse by the king of the subject land and his servants and assignsfor the purposes of travel and transportation, subject to the rule, 'All that the king has is the right of passage and repassagefor himself and his subjects.' Such rights of passage and repassage were known as the 'King's Highways', [10] or, asnowadays, the 'Queen's Highways', depending on the gender of the monarch, and have a history in Englandstretching back to at least the year 859 of the modern era [11] and at least the C14th in Wales, [12]   [13]   [14] though thereis evidence that it was much earlier than both. [15] Such antiquity and the srcins and purposes of the Law of Hywel Dda, and of its supposed blessing by the Pope,strongly suggests that the concept of 'the King's Highways' in law may have srcinated in the days of theRoman Empire after Christianity became its official religion, and that the 'king' in 'King's Highways' meant the Son of God,in his capacity as the 'King of Kings', and that it meant all of the earth above sea level apart from the rivers and lakeson it, because, as Christianity believes, hecan walk on water, and that 'real estate' srcinally meant all of the earth and all objects and life on and in it, as that is what Christianity believes to be his inheritance. It is evidence from theperiod of the Crusades in Europe that pilgrims, adherents, servants and soldiers of the Roman Catholic Church hadsimilar rights throughout over most, if not all, of that continent, and of parts of the Middle East and North Africa,which again suggests that they srcinated in the days of the Roman Empire after Christianity became its officialreligion and srcinally meant all of that land, not just narrow strips of it.So, the land designated in law over whichsuch travel andtransportation rights of passage and repassage fora king and his subjects existed could be a candidate for the 'real' in 'real estate' meaning 'relating to a thing, distinguishedfrom a person', the 'thing' being the lawful entitlement 'title' of the king and his subjects to the use and enjoyment of those rights of passage and repassage. But the term 'highways' is the lawful name of such strips of land in Britain.The earliest legal document containing a word that is recognizably 'highway' was the one in the year 859 [16] mentioned above.Though frequently used in official documents, such as property deeds and court records in England for manycenturies in common law, the first statutory law of highways was the Highways Act 1555 by Elizabeth I of England,the second daughter of Henry VIII, who sought to rectify the confusion that her sister, Mary I of England, caused byattempting to reinstate the status of the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales because she became a RomanCatholic in order to marry Philip of Spain. Until then, with only one exception, namely the Statute of Bridges, the  Real estate3law of highways in England and Wales had relied solely upon the common law of England (and before 1535, on theseparate common law of those two nations, hence Henry VIII's need to eradicate the common law of Wales on1535).The reign of Elizabeth I is particularly noteworthy as the start of the growth and development of the British Empirebeyond the shores of Great Britain; and, the word 'highway' became common currency wherever English was spokenin those parts of the world. Vast tracts of land became regarded as highways in these new territories where wide,open space was common, such as the routes of pony-express riders, wagon trains, cattle droves and gold miners inNorth America, and, where settlement occurred, roads and streets were formed by the inhabitants under theprovisions of the Highways Acts 1555 and 1562, and, any immigrant allowed access to those parts of the world viatheir borders became regarded as subjects of the Crown of Great Britain for the duration of such visa granted by theborder authority, and thus entitled to the use and enjoyment of those highways, roads and streets.Great Britain retained such rights of passage and repassage for the Sovereign Head of Great Britain and its subjectsfor the purposes of travel and transportation in, over and across land comprising its former territory overseas whenthose lands became independent of Great Britain, by declaring them highways before they were awardedindependence, such as in the British territories that became independent of Britain in the United States of Americadue to the American Revolutionary War and Peace of Paris (1783).According to the Wikipedia article on allodial land, there is no longer any allodial land in England and Wales.Therefore, it follows that all of England and Wales is now 'real estate' in the 'royal' sense, and Great Britain no longerhas any need to retain any currency for the 'relating to a thing, distinguished from a person' sense in Britain except asan academic interest in the history of the land law of Britain, and only to ensure currency of the 'highway' sense inthe territories outside Great Britain, such as its former colonies in the United States of America.The need for departure from the 'royal' sense of 'real estate' in the UnitedStates of America sprang from the BritishCrown's abandonment of any claims to its territories in the United States of America by the Treaty of Paris, 1783;but, events that had happened in England and Wales since the Fall of the Roman Empire had consequences in theUnited States of America both before and after its former British territories acquired independence from Britain, tothis day, which are worthy of note in the context of the meaning, protection and assertion of the 'real estate' of GreatBritain throughout the world, but in the United States of America in particular.The connection between king and church throughout history since Christianity became the official religion of theRoman Empire is the reason for those consequences. Whilst Christianity believes that God can be and is everywhereat once throughout the universe, it is not physically possible for a king to be everywhere at once on all parts of hiskingdom and throughout the rest of the world to superintend all of the 'real estate' in the 'royal' sense, of all of theproperty and rights of passage and repassage entrusted to him until, as Christianity believes, the 'king of kings', in theform of the resurrected Son of God, returns to reclaim God's kingdom on earth and rule over it.The Roman solution to this dilemma had been typically organisational: partitioning its empire into divisions andappointing suitably qualified and trusted persons for the purpose of superintending those divisions and thedevelopment of settlements, roads, bridges, etc. within them, under a pyramidal heirarchy of governance reaching upto the emperor himself, similar to many other empires, states, and nations in the history of world civilization, be theymonarchical, democratic, republican or communist.This challenged the remaining occupants of the abandoned divisions when the Roman organisation model collapsedon the demise of its Empire, hence the emergence of kings ('king' from Old English 'cyning', 'cynig'; 'cynn' meaning'race'; Old Welsh 'cynog', Old Saxon 'kuning') [17] to superintend and govern so much of the former Roman Empire asthey were able to acquire by agreement or by conquest, or as much of it as fell to them by election or by inheritance,on behalf of God, under the pyramidal organisational umbrella of the Roman Catholic Church headed by the Pope.Some believe there is evidence that these kings may have claimed, or have been attributed to be, direct descendentsof the Son of God from his visit to earth in human form at the time of the Roman Empire in Europe, the Middle Eastand North Africa (see The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail), hence the 'royal blood line' which Henry VIII claimed to  Real estate4have, by direct lineage via the claim of his father, Henry VII, the first of the Tudor dynasty, to be descended fromRhodri Mawr, the first king of Wales, via Hywel Dda; [18] which he regarded as giving him divine authority to set upthe Church of England and confiscate all the property of the Roman Catholic Church in both England and Wales,which the Pope did not prevent, even by force, which suggests that he thought too. So, even in late Medieval times,regal minds were still centred on the emergence of kings on and after the demise of the Roman Empire to govern theterritories they acquired and what were those kings' claims to kingship.The dilemma that a king could not be everywhere at once on his kingdom and all the earth to superintend the 'realestate' interests he had a duty of God to assert and protect, was solved in England and, subsequently, Wales,Scotland, Ireland, the English Channel Islands, the British colonies and the rest of the world, by the king of Englandchartering and commissioning civilian and military personnel, called esquires, specifically for the task, appointedunder sworn oath to assert and protect the works and highways interests of the English crown on those territories,and the tradition continues to this day,under the Queen of Great Britain and its Territories, Elizabeth II of England.The etymological srcins of the title Esquire [19] and its cognate Squire [20] attest to its antiquity.During the massive expansion of British territory into the British Empire that began in the late C16th, there had to bea consequential increase in the number of thus qualified people to assert and protect the 'real estate' comprising thenew territory, and, because the title had no protection under common or statutory law from being used by personswho were not royally entitled to use it, people who were not awardered the title by the Crown Head of Great Britain,or authorised to award the title by the Crown of the Great Britain, assumed the title unto themselves and awarded itto others who were also not so royally entitled, even their children, including foreign nationals relative to Britain, togive them the appearance of being qualified by the British Crown. In time, even the Palace administration beganaddressing letters using the subnominal title or its abbreviated form regardless of whether the addressees had been sochartered and commissioned, giving the addressees that had not been so chartered and commissioned the appearanceof also having been professionary qualified by the British Crown.Consequently, the long-standing merit of the title, of certifying that the background, physical and mental health,education, training, experience, commitment, morality and loyalty of the person entitled to use it had been examinedand found suitable by the Crown to assert and protect its real estate interests at home or abroad, was undermined.For example, the Parish Tithe Maps and Schedules of England and Wales produced under the Tithe CommutationAct 1836 included many entries with the abbreviated postnomial title 'Esq.' written after the names of respectiveproperty holders, whereas the enumerators books for the 1841 population census of the United Kingdom, at about thesame time as the Parish Tithe Maps and Schedules were being published, contained instructions to enumerators,including, with regard to the Names column, Insert without distinction or omission, every living person whoabode or slept in each house...The words Lord , Lady , Sir , Rt. Hon. , Hon. may be put before the names towhom they belong. and with regard to the column headed Profession, Trade, Employment, or Of IndependentMeans , Rank, or any such term as Esq. or Gentleman must not be entered in this column. Effectively thismeant the terms Esquire and Esq. were expressly excluded from the census.Nevertheless, any misuse of any title can be deemed to be supporting evidence of fraud, if the object of its being soused is proven to have been wilfully intended to deceive for the purposes of fraud. The Wikipedia article on Esquirecontains references to use of that title in the United States of America by persons qualified to practice law in theUnited States of America, of which references 3 and 10 are of particular interest in the above regard.
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!